<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Mind of The Arts &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com</link>
	<description>A fresh look at the media industry and how trends affect the independent artist and publisher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>The 1% Rule vs. The 1:1 Ratio</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One only has to look at iLife, Apple's Am/Pro-Am content creation suite (now complete with a webpage editor that sports RSS feeds).Some have put forth a suggestion, that only 1% of the online world is creating content....  Their numbers, stating that out of 100 people, 1 would create the content, 10 would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other 89 users would simple view it.Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally The 1:1 Ratio holds true for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An emerging trend in the online world is that the gap between content creator and the content consumer is closing. Personal Computers come pre-installed with many content creation tools, and many more aimed at the Amateur to the Pro-Am content cretor abound. One only has to look at <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/" title="Apple's iLife '06">iLife, Apple&#8217;s Am/Pro-Am content creation suite </a>(now <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/iweb/" title="Apple's iWeb">complete with a webpage editor</a> that sports RSS feeds).<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/" title="Guardian Unlimited">Some</a> have put forth a suggestion, that only <strong>1%</strong> of the online world is creating content. This seems awfully low to me. I have always thought of it as <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>, for every content creator in a community there is a consumer, that in turn is also a creator. Their numbers, stating that out of <strong>100</strong> people, <strong>1</strong> would create the content, <strong>10</strong> would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other <strong>89</strong> users would simple view it.<br />
Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong> holds true for me. Their numbers come from YouTube&#8217;s upload vs download ratio, and obviously skew the results because of the size of the sample. I&#8217;m not doubting their findings, but it&#8217;s interesting to hear the same theory in different contexts.<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1823959,00.html?gusrc=rss" target="_blank">Read the article</a>, and decide for yourself. It&#8217;d be cool if you <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#respond" title="Leave a Comment For Us!">left a comment</a> too, and let me know which rule holds more true for you, <strong>The 1% Rule</strong>, or <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_1_Rule">digg story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/48/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/apple/feed/ ) in 1.15389 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:18 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 3:05 pm UTC -->
