<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Mind of The Arts &#187; Digg.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/diggcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com</link>
	<description>A fresh look at the media industry and how trends affect the independent artist and publisher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>How shooting digitally changes acting (and directing)</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/how-shooting-digitally-changes-acting-and-directing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/how-shooting-digitally-changes-acting-and-directing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/02/how-shooting-digitally-changes-acting-and-directing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can get behind this:"The old model of acting is that the rehearsal is great and then things change when you say 'rolling' --usually for the worse....  It was his first forray into digital film making, and there was a certain authenticity in the faces of the actors.And this seems to be the trend.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can get behind this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The old model of acting is that the rehearsal is great and then things change when you say &#8216;rolling&#8217; &#8211;usually for the worse. Now there&#8217;s no film in the camera. You can shoot everything. So there&#8217;s no rehearsal. Or perhaps it&#8217;s all rehearsal. Either way, it&#8217;s far more natural.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>There is something powerful about this. I couldn&#8217;t quite put my finger on it when I was watching the War of the Worlds (Spielberg Version), but the above quote triggered it for me. It was his first forray into digital film making, and there was a certain authenticity in the faces of the actors.<br />
And this seems to be the trend. As more and more directors adopt digital film making techniques, and become comfortable with these tools, the human condition will finally be reflected on the silver screen in a way that here-to-fore has rarely been seen.<br />
That&#8217;s something I can really <a href="http://digg.com/movies/How_shooting_digitally_changes_acting_and_directing/blog" target="_blank" title="Digg the article">digg</a>.<br />
<em><a href="http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2006/08/how_shooting_di.html">another long tail insight</a></em><a href="http://digg.com/movies/How_shooting_digitally_changes_acting_and_directing"><br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/53/how-shooting-digitally-changes-acting-and-directing/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/how-shooting-digitally-changes-acting-and-directing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with &#8220;RIAA vs The People&#8221; founder Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Brown of the Free Software Foundation speaks with Ray Beckerman, lawyer for defendants in RIAA lawsuits about the impact of the RIAA's legal strategy on the internet, copyright, DRM and our digital freedoms.  He leads the discussion with the reason why only small law firms, or individual lawyers will ever take up the cause of those being sued by the RIAA.He also dissects a typical RIAA "investigation" that form the basis of their suit against their customers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Brown of the <a href="http://www.fsf.org/" title="Free Software Foundation">Free Software Foundation</a> speaks with Ray Beckerman, lawyer for defendants in RIAA lawsuits about the impact of the RIAA&#8217;s legal strategy on the internet, copyright, DRM and our digital freedoms. He leads the discussion with the reason why only small law firms, or individual lawyers will ever take up the cause of those being sued by the RIAA.<br />
He also dissects a typical RIAA &#8220;investigation&#8221; that form the basis of their suit against their customers. In essense the RIAA creates an account with a p2p network, finds users with RIAA tunes in their shared folder, and files the report. However, and this is the kicker, there is no proof of wrongdoing. That is, there is no proof that the user did not obtain the song through legal means (purchasing them, or making a back-up copy from a CD they legally own), nor is there proof that other users have ever downloaded the song. In other words, most of the RIAA lawsuits brought against consumers are mere ploys to extort money.<br />
Many users have settled out of court. The few that fight it get into long drawn out court cases where every dirty trick in the book is used by the RIAA Legal Team to make it prohibitively expensive for the defendant to continue fighting the case. Lawyers, such as Ray Beckerman, are working pro bono or for significantly reduced rates on the behalf of the few brave souls willing to stand up and challenge the RIAA. Especially since many of the defendants have never used p2p software before, and until their subpoena arrived in the mail had never even heard of Kazzaa and the like.<br />
If you want to help, you can <a href="https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/dbd" title="Donate Money to help fund Defendants against RIAA Lawsuits">donate money to the Free Software Foundation</a>.<br />
Keep up with Ray and his fight against the RIAA at his blog: <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/" title="Recording Industry vs. The People">RIAA vs. The People</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/DefectiveByDesignCallWithRayBeckerman/DBD_Call_with_Ray_20060719b_64kb.mp3" title="Interview with Ray Beckerman, Lawyer defending people against lawsuits brought on by the RIAA">Download The MP3 recording of the call</a><br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_truth_about_the_RIAA_lawsuits_-_DefectiveByDesign.org">digg this story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/47/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.archive.org/download/DefectiveByDesignCallWithRayBeckerman/DBD_Call_with_Ray_20060719b_64kb.mp3" length="7290540" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Toys with Selling MP3s</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/yahoo-toys-with-selling-mp3s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/yahoo-toys-with-selling-mp3s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/yahoo-toys-with-selling-mp3s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo!, who owns and operates Yahoo! Music &#8211; a digital distribution store built with Microsofts &#8216;Plays For Sure&#8217; DRM technology, is toying with the idea of selling unprotected, DRM-Free MP3s. In a recent survey, they asked participants the following question: &#8220;Would you consider paying $1.09 for a single, unrestricted MP3 download that would have absolutely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Yahoo!, who owns and operates Yahoo! Music &#8211; a digital distribution store built with Microsofts &#8216;Plays For Sure&#8217; DRM technology, is toying with the idea of selling unprotected, DRM-Free MP3s. In a <a href="http://hansmast.com/index.php?title=yahoo_music_to_offer_unrestricted_mp3s&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1" title="Yahoo! Music Survey">recent survey</a>, they asked participants the following question:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Would you consider paying $1.09 for a single, unrestricted MP3 download that would have absolutely no limitations on its use and could be transferred to any portable audio player or computer?&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Don&#8217;t get hung up on the price. To me that&#8217;s irrelevant. The fact that not only a major content distributor would consider MP3, but is willing to face down Apple and the Big 4 Labels is a major step forward. Though you could liken it to DRM poisoning the water supply and suppliers are now going to sell &#8216;clean&#8217; water on the side, I consider this to be a bold move on their part, and since <a href="http://polyvi.be/" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Polyvibe Records</a> <a href="http://music.yahoo.com/release/34382389" title="Future Funk Collective on Yahoo! Music" class="broken_link">distributes music with them</a> as part of a larger digital distribution deal, I am awaiting their next announcement concerning this with much anxiousness.
</p>
<p>
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Yahoo_Offers_Unrestricted_MP3_(non-DRM)_Download">digg this story</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/yahoo-toys-with-selling-mp3s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frequently Awkward Questions for the Entertainment Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/frequently-awkward-questions-for-the-entertainment-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/frequently-awkward-questions-for-the-entertainment-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boing Boing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassroots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tivo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/13/frequently-awkward-questions-for-the-entertainment-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music The RIAA has sued more than 20,000 music fans for file sharing, yet file sharing continues to rapidly increase both online and offline.? When will you stop suing music fans? The RIAA has sued over 20,000 music fans for file sharing, who have on average paid a $3,750 settlement.? That&#8217;s over $75,000,000.? Has any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<strong>Music</strong>
</p>
<ol>
<li>The RIAA <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/?f=riaa-v-thepeople.html" class="broken_link">has sued</a> more than 20,000 music fans for file sharing, yet file sharing continues to rapidly increase both online and offline.?  When will you stop suing music fans?</li>
<li>The RIAA <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/?f=riaa-v-thepeople.html" class="broken_link">has sued</a> over 20,000 music fans for file sharing, who have on average paid a $3,750 settlement.?  That&#8217;s over $75,000,000.?  Has any money collected from your lawsuits gone to pay actual artists? Where&#8217;s all that money going?</li>
<li>The RIAA <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/?f=riaa-v-thepeople.html" class="broken_link">has sued</a> over 20,000 music fans for file sharing.?  Recently, an RIAA representative reportedly <a href="http://www-tech.mit.edu/V126/N15/RIAA1506.html">suggested that</a> &#8220;students drop out of college or go to community college in order to be able to afford [P2P lawsuit] settlements.&#8221; Do you stand by this advice? Is this really good advice for our children&#8217;s futures?</li>
<li>The RIAA said that it only went after individual file sharers because you couldn&#8217;t go after P2P system creators. After the Supreme Court&#8217;s <em>Grokster</em> decision, shouldn&#8217;t you stop going after music fans?</li>
<li>Major entertainment companies <a href="http://www.eff.org/endangered" class="broken_link">have repeatedly brought lawsuits to block new technologies</a>, including the VCR, Digital Audio Tape recorders, the first MP3 player, the ReplayTV PVR, and now P2P software. Why is your industry so hostile to new technologies?</li>
<li>DRM has <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/DMCA_against_the_darknet.pdf" class="broken_link">clearly failed</a> to stop songs from getting on file sharing networks, but it does <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/guide/" class="broken_link">prevent</a> me from moving lawfully purchased music onto my iPod and other portable devices.?  Unlike the major record labels, many popular indie labels offer mp3 downloads through sites like eMusic.?  Why won&#8217;t you let fans purchase mp3s as well?</li>
<li>The RIAA says that it doesn&#8217;t mind if I rip CDs to my personal computer and put them on my iPod.?  Do I need your permission to do this or can I legally do it <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004409.php">even if you object</a>?</li>
<li>Recording off the radio is clearly permitted by copyright law and something Americans have done for over 25 years, but the RIAA supports legislation <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/digitalradio/" class="broken_link">restricting devices that record from digital radio</a>. Why are you against TiVo for radio?</li>
<li>Sony BMG <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/Sony-BMG/" class="broken_link">recently implemented a DRM technology</a> that damaged users&#8217; computers.?  But for independent researchers&#8217; analyses, this serious flaw may have gone undiscovered. After this scandal, will record labels allow any computer scientist or security expert to examine these products and agree not to sue them under the DMCA?</li>
</ol>
<p>
<strong>Video</strong>
</p>
<ol>
<li>The major movie studios have been enjoying some of their most profitable years in history over the past five years. Can you cite to any specific studies that prove noncommercial file sharing among fans, as opposed to commercial DVD piracy, has hurt the studios&#8217; bottom line in any significant way?</li>
<li>Is it legal for me to bypass CSS DVD encryption in order to skip the &#8220;unskippable&#8221; previews at the beginning of so many DVDs? Why should I have to be forced to watch these ads when I already bought the DVD?</li>
<li>Is it legal for me to skip the commercials when I play back time-shifted TV recordings on my TiVo or other PVR? How is this different than getting up and going to the bathroom?</li>
<li>Why are there region-code restrictions on DVDs? How does this prevent copyright infringement? Is it illegal for me to buy or and use a region-free DVD player, or to modify a DVD player to be region-free?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/" class="broken_link">In several lawsuits</a>, the MPAA has repeatedly said that it&#8217;s illegal to make a back-up of a DVD that I purchased.?  Why is this illegal?</li>
<li>Is it ever legal for me to use software like DVD Shrink or Handbrake to rip a digital copy of a DVD I own onto a video iPod or my laptop? What if I want clips to use for a class report? Or if a teacher wants to include a clip in a PowerPoint slide?</li>
<li>Is there anything illegal about copying TV shows I’ve recorded off the air onto my video iPod?</li>
<li>If the MPAA-backed <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/broadcastflag/" class="broken_link">&#8220;broadcast flag&#8221;</a> bill passes, I won&#8217;t be able to move recorded TV content digitally to my current video iPod.?  Why should TV studios get to take away my ability to lawfully time- and space-shift?</li>
<li>Major entertainment companies <a href="http://www.eff.org/endangered" class="broken_link">have repeatedly brought lawsuits to block new technologies</a>, including the VCR, Digital Audio Tape recorders, the first MP3 player, the ReplayTV PVR, and now P2P software. Why is your industry so hostile to new technologies?</li>
<li>Hollywood is pushing legislation to <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/analoghole/" class="broken_link">&#8220;plug the analog hole.&#8221;</a> These restrictions won&#8217;t keep copyrighted video off of file sharing networks, but they will block me from excerpting a recorded TV show for a school report or using tools like the Slingbox to send recorded TV shows to myself over the Internet.?  Why are you trying to restrict these legitimae uses?</li>
</ol>
<p>Questions posed by the <a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/faq/" target="_blank" title="EFF - Fighting for your digital rights" class="broken_link">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a>. Reprinted with permission. <em>Spotted on <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/11/embarrassing_questio.html" target="_blank" title="Boing Boing Article discussing the EFF FAQ">Boing Boing</a> and <a href="http://digg.com/music/Embarrassing_questions_for_the_entertainment_industry_2" target="_blank">Digg</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/frequently-awkward-questions-for-the-entertainment-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/youtube-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/youtube-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/13/youtube-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the Terms of Use, people. In reponse to people crying about YouTube removing videos they deem inappropriate from their site. digg this story originally published on dr.xnlb.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the Terms of Use, people.<br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/atCF5kyR6J4"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/atCF5kyR6J4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />
In reponse to people crying about YouTube removing videos they deem inappropriate from their site.<br />
<a href="http://digg.com/videos_educational/YouTube_Rights">digg this story</a><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/43/youtube-rights/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/youtube-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re not the only one to discount Jupiter Research&#8217;s research&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/were-not-the-only-one-to-discount-jupiter-researchs-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/were-not-the-only-one-to-discount-jupiter-researchs-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jupiter Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/06/were-not-the-only-one-to-discount-jupiter-researchs-research/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first, JupiterResearch was going to honor the request, but decided:"After looking at your blog link JupiterResearch has decided not to fulfill your request for more information since the blog is closely tied with your company that serves as a consultancy.  I’m sorry I didn’t tell you this earlier, I didn’t realize that your company and blog were so closely affiliated."So on one hand, JupiterResearch extols the virtues of corporate blogging, but decided to shut out Toby Bloomberg for not being a credible source of information about JupiterResearch.I've said it before, and I'll say it again...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for <a href="http://bloombergmarketing.blogs.com/bloomberg_marketing/2006/06/jupiterresearch.html" title="Bloomberg Marketing - blog post - Jupiter Research Blog Report">a recent blog post</a>, marketing blogger <a href="http://bloombergmarketing.blogs.com/bloomberg_marketing/about2.html" target="_blank" title="Toby Bloombert - Marketing Diva">Toby Bloomberg</a>, asked for more information about the methodolgies behind their Corporate Blogging report. The report wildly claimed that by the end of 2006 70% of corporations will have a corporate blog. Considering that the number of Fortune 500 companies with blogs hovers at around 6%, Toby questioned how they added up all the numbers. At first, JupiterResearch was going to honor the request, but decided:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;After looking at your blog link JupiterResearch has decided not to fulfill your request for more information since the blog is closely tied with your company that serves as a consultancy. I’m sorry I didn’t tell you this earlier, I didn’t realize that your company and blog were so closely affiliated.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So on one hand, JupiterResearch extols the virtues of corporate blogging, but decided to shut out Toby Bloomberg for not being a credible source of information about JupiterResearch.<br />
<a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/02/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/" title="Previous Post on JupiterResearch">I&#8217;ve said it before</a>, and I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; Take what JupiterResearch says with a grain of salt. Their methods seem very self serving and thier anaylsis is starting to show it&#8217;s age. The way they conduct themselves, and their research in the social media space is hard for me to swallow.<br />
Other bloggers have joined in the fray, including Fard Johnmar, who spent $750 to get a copy of the report. <a href="http://www.healthcarevox.com/2006/06/corporate_blogging_and_jupiter.html" target="_blank" title="Fard Johnmar's Post on JupiterResearch and Corporate Blogging">Read his take on it</a>, because even after reading it, he still has questions about it&#8217;s methodology and plenty of other unanswered queries that the even purchasing the full report did not address.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/business_finance/JupiterResearch_Passes_Around_The_Kool-Aid_about_Blogging">digg this story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/40/were-not-the-only-one-to-discount-jupiter-researchs-research/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/were-not-the-only-one-to-discount-jupiter-researchs-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Google DID NOT buy MySpace&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/30/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has recently come to light that there were other companies with their eye on MySpace, before it was scooped up by Rupert Murdoch and News Corp.  It seems Google was also considering it, but didn't go after it because it will essentially kill it's AdSense business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has recently come to light that there were other companies with their eye on MySpace, before it was scooped up by Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. It seems Google was also considering it, but didn&#8217;t go after it because it will essentially kill it&#8217;s <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/" target="_blank" title="Google AdSense">AdSense</a> business. Think about it, if they purchased a content site, with more hits per day then god him/her-self <em>(</em><em><a href="http://www.god.com/index.php" target="_blank" title="God Dot Com">s/he&#8217;s got his/her own homepage</a></em><em> it seems)</em>, they would be a direct competitor to every single one of their content partners that use <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/" target="_blank" title="Google AdSense">AdSense</a> to pay for their site.<br />
<a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002684.php" target="_blank" title="Battlle Media">Read the 2nd hand report here</a>, as told by an anonymous Google employee.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/the_REAL_reason_Google_did_NOT_buy_MySpace_-_AdSense_says_Web_2.0_Founder">spotted on digg.com</a></em></p>
<p><a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/37/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/" target="_blank" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ars Technica disects the Movie Rental Business</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/ars-technica-disects-the-movie-rental-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/ars-technica-disects-the-movie-rental-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tivo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/05/ars-technica-disects-the-movie-rental-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's an interesting read detailing the current landscape of brick and mortor rentals, online rentals by mail, and moves into more digital realms with a discussion of DVRs and Video on Demand.The moral of the story?...  and with more and more of the best content being created at the cottage industry level, the larger content providers (i.e. RIAA/MPAA content providers) are only marginalizing themselves by not making the content their audience wants in the format(s) they want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leading technology + culture website, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/index.ars">Ars Technica</a>, disects the world of movie rentals and details their experiences. It&#8217;s an interesting read detailing the current landscape of brick and mortor rentals, online rentals by mail, and moves into more digital realms with a discussion of DVRs and Video on Demand.<br />
The moral of the story? When working a niche genre of content, availability is king&#8230; and with more and more of the best content being created at the cottage industry level, the larger content providers (i.e. RIAA/MPAA content providers) are only marginalizing themselves by not making the content their audience wants in the format(s) they want. It gets even worse the lower down the totem pole you move. Distributors of content will soon find themselves out of business if they don&#8217;t start looking at how to service the niche customers better than they can now.<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/blockbusted.ars">Read The Full Story On Ars Technica</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/movies/Blockbusted_Movie_Rentals_of_Today_and_Tomorrow">Digg This Story</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/30/ars-technica-disects-the-movie-rental-business/" target="_blank" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/ars-technica-disects-the-movie-rental-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digg-like site for Creative Commons Music</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/digg-like-site-for-creative-commons-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/digg-like-site-for-creative-commons-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 19:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boing Boing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/02/digg-like-site-for-creative-commons-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site is a clone of the popular tech news site, digg.com, and allows all users to submit links to CC Licensed MP3s, and then the community will vote on them....  These numbers are sure to go up as more users find the site.Each track is given room for the Artist, Album, Website, tags, and other tasty meta-data so that you know what it is, and where to go for more info, which makes it ideal as a promotion mechanism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://cchits.ning.com/">CC Hits</a> is a web-app to post and vote on <a href="http://www.creativecommons.com/">Creative Commons</a> Licensed music. The site just got started, so there&#8217;s not a lot of voting going on yet. However, if it takes off, this will definitely fill a void that&#8217;s missing on the internet. The site is a clone of the popular tech news site, digg.com, and allows all users to submit links to CC Licensed MP3s, and then the community will vote on them. There is a link at the top called, <a href="http://cchits.ning.com/hits/">&#8220;Hits&#8221;</a>, that displays all the top voted tracks. With the average so far being only about 5 &#8211; 10 votes. These numbers are sure to go up as more users find the site.
</p>
<p>
Each track is given room for the Artist, Album, Website, tags, and other tasty meta-data so that you know what it is, and where to go for more info, which makes it ideal as a promotion mechanism. It includes an in-page MP3 player so that you can listen to the tracks before voting on them. A registration with <a href="http://www.ning.com/">Ning.com</a> is required to vote, as the site was built using their cloning technology, and user accounts are centralized across all the cloned sites built with <a href="http://www.ning.com/">Ning</a>. It&#8217;s not as slick as digg, but it&#8217;s close enough.
</p>
<p>
We&#8217;ll be keeping an eye on this site, as it has the potential to <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blow_up#Verb">blow up</a>, but right now its filled with early adopters only.
</p>
<p>
<em><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/01/digglike_site_to_tra.html">Spotted on Boing Boing</a></em><em>.
</p>
<p>
</em><a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/27/digg-like-site-for-creative-commons-music/" target="_blank" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/digg-like-site-for-creative-commons-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/diggcom/feed/ ) in 0.48786 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:48 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 3:35 pm UTC -->
