Tag Archive for 'DRM'

Major Labels are Getting Creative in 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed.
Thanks for visiting!

Spotted on: Freep.com

Here’s a great article about the new marketing methods we’ll be seeing in 2008.  We will begin to see large scale experiments in subscription based music distribution and other models which eliminate a pay by the track model (such as Imeem).  The death of DRM may come this year, as three of the Big Four labels are already in the process of abandoning it.  There are rumors of deals in the works between major labels and ISPs (internet service providers) to offer unlimited downloads or more bandwidth, and we can expect to see multiple collectible versions of albums released.

As the shift in music sales hits overdrive into the digital realm, 2008 is shaping up to be the year the major labels begin to adapt to environment.  The big question left is: how will artists break into the big time?

Bottom Line:  The Big Four are finally entering the digital revolution.

Amazon Makes A Big Move with MP3s

Spotted on: Digital Music News

Mega online retailer Amazon is preparing to offer their MP3s in every language.  The company cites an overwhelming demand from customers for their DRM-free music downloads (which includes titale from all of the major labels).

Given the size and power Amazon carries on the internet, they are poised to set a new precedent for selling music digitally.  The largest online retailer of music by far is iTunes, and it will be interesting to see how Amazon’s shift to DRM-free music changes the playing field.

Bottom Line: Amazon offering their MP3 catalog worldwide will shift the landscape and methodology of digital music sales.

A DRM free World

Spotted on: Gizmodo

The way the major labels are adapting to the transforming music industry is strange. Somehow, the four largest music labels in the world seem to be the last ones to understand what people want. From the perspective of an onlooker, it seems like they wait till the last second to adapt to everything.

DRM is officially becoming a thing of the past. According to Business Week, it appears that Amazon’s DRM free service and billion MP3 Giveaway has brought the Big Four around to a DRM free world (at least for some albums). Sony BMG, the last of the big four labels to cling to DRM like a liferaft, has announced they will stop using it sometime early this year.

This is the magic moment when the major labels have all given up on the wildly unpopular copyright protection. Sony is using a gift card service, where listeners can buy cards at retail outlets (such as Best Buy and Target) and then redeem them for MP3 albums online.

Considering the 15% drop in CD sales last year, it’s refreshing to see that the major labels are adapting to the desires of their audiences, even if it is forced by pressure from iTunes and Amazon. DRM was instrumental in iTunes gaining dominance in the music download market, and now even they are beginning to offer DRM free tracks, and at the same 99 cent price tag.

Bottom Line: DRM will finally be relegated to where it belongs, on subscription services.

Controlling the Internet

Spotted on: Digital Music News / ArsTechnica  

As if throttling Bit Torrent, blocking access to sites like AllofMP3.com and PirateBay, and endless industry litigation aren’t eroding net neutrality enough, the IFPI is taking it a step further.  The IFPI is an international version of the RIAA, and the recently sent a memo to the European Union about file sharing.

The IFPI wants to see Europe’s internet monitored, managed, and controlled.  They are presenting a “complete solution to piracy”.  This three step process looks something like this:

1.  Scan the entire internet for audio files, and block files that don’t match up to a database of music.  This practice is called content filtering.  Although it seems benign, the practice of monitoring the entire internet is a slippery slope toward full scale surveillance.  Aside from harming commerce and academic research, having a huge government database of people’s web activity can be used for more malicious purposes then chasing down people who are illegally downloading music.

2.  Blocking peer to peer protocols.  A protocol is a standard for connecting and sharing data, and P2P networks have their own protocol.  If ISPs systematically ferret out and block these protocols, academics and businesses won’t be able to share large files, either.

3.  Blocking websites that offer illegal content.  Although the practice of blocking sites that offer pirated music is a method of controlling the practice, it is a legal precedent that governments can block web sites.  The power of the internet is its freedom, and blocking sites is a step toward censoring that freedom.  Once governments are free to block one kind of website, where will they draw the line?
Consider that a corporation is lobbying a government to restrict and monitor the internet airwaves.  If the IFPA has their way, they are setting the stage for full scale internet controls and censorship. While the intention of protecting their corporate interests isn’t truly malicious, the methods they suggest pave the way for an internet that is no longer open and free.
Bottom Line:  Setting a precedent for government control of the internet is a precursor to full scale internet censorship.  Considering the human tendency to use any means at our disposal, creating this kind of monitoring and control apparatus is a disturbing action for personal liberty.

Doug Morris: Music Industry Genius or Bitter Luddite?

Spotted on: Wired.com (and thanks for this awesome article)

In the wake of the announcement that Universal and SonyBMG are uniting to start a new download service to compete with iTunes (which will offer 75% of all music sold in the US), Doug Morris, Universal Music Group’s CEO, was profiled in Wired Magazine the other day.

Let’s start with my favorite quote from the article: “There’s no one in the record company that’s a technologist, That’s a misconception writers make all the time, that the record industry missed this. They didn’t. They just didn’t know what to do. It’s like if you were suddenly asked to operate on your dog to remove his kidney. What would you do?” (quoted from Wired article).

Answer: I would find a veterinarian.  The head of the world’s largest record company claims ignorance of the fundamental shift in the entertainment industry over the last decade. I find it interesting that the largest music company on the planet was unable to prepare for the digital revolution.  Ignorance may be bliss, but you’re still dead when the falling piano you don’t see hits you.

As if that isn’t ironic enough, Morris goes on to say “We didn’t know who to hire… I wouldn’t be able to recognize a good technology person — anyone with a good bullshit story would have gotten past me.”

Perhaps this is why you have twenty VPs, Mr. Morris.  What good is an army of executives if they are incapable of determining who to hire and what to do?  Mr. Morris makes it obvious how major labels have destroyed their business model and viability.

For years, Doug Morris has been railing for stringent enforcement of copyrights (the ones his company has been taking form artists for decades), and he was at the source of Universal attacking Yahoo, YouTube, and Myspace for their flippant distribution of corporately owned content.  This powerful industry insider has the pull to force companies to give him what he wants: licensing fees, commission on Zune sales; the most powerful man in the music industry calls the shots.  And now he’s changing his tune, embracing digital technology.  It isn’t for the benefit or convenience of audiences though, it’s an attempt to consolidate the digital realm.

The article discusses how iTunes pulled the wool over Morris’ eyes.  Since Universal could not find anyone with a technology background to advise them, they (and Morris) never saw the power Apple’s iPod would have to control the industry.  Considering how much music is sold on iTunes, that can only be played in iTunes and iPods, this is probably the first time anyone successfully put the Big Four on the defensive.  Major labels had free reign to do whatever they wanted and completely controlled the market, one day they woke up and realized out they weren’t in control anymore.  It was a conscious choice not to hire anyone who knew about the internet, and not to adapt to a shifting industry.  Controlling massive catalogs and marketing muscle isn’t enough.  They want every penny, and they don’t care if we know it.

Here’s another great quote: “It was only a couple of years ago that we said…an album that someone worked on for two years — is that worth only $9, $10…?” People never really understand what’s happening to the artists. All the sharing of the music…Is it correct that people…fill up these devices with music they haven’t paid for? If you had Coca-Cola coming through the faucet in your kitchen, how much would you be willing to pay for Coca-Cola? ….That’s what happened to the record business.” (quoted from the Wired article).

While this is a noble sentiment, in reality artists are not making a ton of money off of these deals, at least to compared to what the record companies reap.  While we all want to support hard working artists, it’s difficult to find compassion for a seven billion dollar a year company.  Sometimes audiences forget that artists are human beings when faced with the behemoth of major labels squeezing us for every penny they can.  It’s even more difficult to feel sorry for these companies that own and control the rights to artists like Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, Pink Floyd, Miles Davis, and timeless artists that sell with or without marketing.

Doug Morris started out as a producer and a songwriter.  Considering his roots, it’s surprising that he has such scorn for the future of music, and the satisfaction of audiences.

If the CEO of the largest record company on the planet is only interested in a fast buck, and is indifferent to the long term future of the music industry, what hope do the Big Four have?

The article concludes with a picture of Doug Morris’ frustration.  he considers his job to be developing new talent, not providing convenience for audiences, or adapting his company to the current environment.  The CEO of Universal Music Group doesn’t want to be bothered with the transformation of the music industry.  And that is the culture of major record labels.  They don’t care whether we enjoy the music we have, or that it’s delivered to us in a format that works.  They are merely interested in a fiscal bottom line for this quarter, and controlling the media we have access to.

Now that the Big Four can’t even count on multi-platinum talent to stay with them, the end is near.  I’m not sure why Doug Morris allowed himself to be profiled.  This article is a clear picture of how major labels have destroyed their own credibility, their business model, and their future.

A special thank you is in order to Wired Magazine and Seth Mnookin for this fantastic article.   You have allowed us see the man behind the curtain, and he’s everything we’d expect him to be.