<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Mind of The Arts &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com</link>
	<description>A fresh look at the media industry and how trends affect the independent artist and publisher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>RIAA Pushes Bill to Expand Criminal Penalties for Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/01/riaa-pushes-bill-to-expand-criminal-penalties-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/01/riaa-pushes-bill-to-expand-criminal-penalties-for-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/01/31/riaa-pushes-bill-to-expand-criminal-penalties-for-copyright-infringement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on ArsTechnica The RIAA wants to expand copyright law, with the apparent intention of having more technicalities to prosecute.? The new law on the table is for album compilations.? Specifically, having each track count as separate count of infringement. Goggle&#8217;s top copyright lawyer was quoted saying the parties pushing this bill have an &#8220;unslakable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted on <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080129-statutory-damages-not-high-enough.html?ref=rss">ArsTechnica</a></p>
<p>The RIAA wants to expand copyright law, with the apparent intention of having more technicalities to prosecute.?  The new law on the table is for album compilations.?  Specifically, having each track count as separate count of infringement.</p>
<p>Goggle&#8217;s top copyright lawyer was quoted saying the parties pushing this bill have an &#8220;unslakable lust for more and more rights, longer terms of protection, draconian criminal provisions, and civil damages that bear no resemblance to the damages suffered&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bottom Line: Fining someone upward of $9,000 for a track with a value of a dollar may not be fair, but lawmakers still seem to align themselves with this kind of enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/01/riaa-pushes-bill-to-expand-criminal-penalties-for-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rightcart Update</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/11/rightcart-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/11/rightcart-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RightCart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/11/12/rightcart-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on: Google, my email inbox. Google Rightcart, and this blog&#8217;s post from last week shows up near the top of page two.? As of last Thursday, the transaction was processed, approximately a week after purchase.? I am grateful that I was allowed to buy my own album after a week of waiting. Thank you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted on: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=rightcart&#038;hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;hs=EsG&#038;pwst=1&#038;start=10&#038;sa=N">Google</a>, my <a target="_blank" href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/www.gmail.com" class="broken_link">email</a> inbox.</p>
<p>Google <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rightcart.com">Rightcart</a>, and this blog&#8217;s post from last week shows up near the top of page two.?  As of last Thursday, the transaction was processed, approximately a week after purchase.?  I am grateful that I was allowed to buy my own album after a week of waiting.</p>
<p>Thank you for tuning in.?  Considering where we are in the page ranks, they must have gotten wind of our dilemma.?  We have disabled RightCart, and will soon be up and running again with eCommerce.?  And a special thank you to the team at RightCart for completing the transaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/11/rightcart-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPAA decides they know more than the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bit Torrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TorrentSpy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/02/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this article:? Sue Google, Not Us, Torrentspy tells Hollywood (spotted on PCWelt) In a legal reply to the MPAA, TorrentSpy claims a person can find more torrents through Google than you can through a torrent portal.? The argunment goes on to say that since TorrentSpy doesn&#8217;t have any copyrighted work on their site, they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this article:?  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcwelt.de/news/englishnews/134613/">Sue Google, Not Us, Torrentspy tells Hollywood</a> (spotted on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcwelt.de/news/englishnews/">PCWelt</a>)<br />
In a legal reply to the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mpaa.org/">MPAA</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.torrentspy.com/">TorrentSpy</a> claims a person can find more torrents through Google than you can through a torrent portal.?  The argunment goes on to say that since TorrentSpy doesn&#8217;t have any copyrighted work on their site, they cannot be held responsible for what people do after they leave their site.<br />
The basis of lawsuits like this is <a target="_blank" href="http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/p2plegalitiesandethics/a/grokster.htm">MGM vs. Grokster</a>.?  In that case it was decided by the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/">Supreme Court</a> that Grokster actively provided tools and promotion for pirating.?  Of course, the Supreme Court also ruled in that case that the act of file sharing, or using <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P2p">p2p software</a> is *_not_* illegal.?  They also ruled that unless a manufacturer actively promotes <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement">piracy</a>, they cannot be held liable for what people do with the software.</p>
<p>So to review for you, TorrentSpy points you toward people who are sharing files you may want, and that&#8217;s all they do.?  They don&#8217;t suggest you steal stuff, and they don;t promote any method of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement#Methods_of_copyright_infringement">copyright infringement</a>. According to the Supreme Court, that means they&#8217;re not breaking the law.?  The MPAA (and the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.riaa.com">RIAA</a>, too) don&#8217;t really care if the Supreme Court allows TorrentSpy to point you toward copyrighted material that&#8217;s shared.?  They are going to sue us all until we pay what they feel they deserve.?  And if that isn&#8217;t enough, they twist the meaning of copyright to protect themselves, and not the artists.<br />
Now I am all for the protection of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17.html">copyrighted works</a>, and I don&#8217;t see a problem with the moral issue that somone&#8217;s movies or music shouldn&#8217;t be free _if there is percieved value._?  But if reality is that people are sharing media, and that most people _still_ buy media, then there is a softer hand to be used to convince us to buy stuff.</p>
<p>As an aside for Americans, these big companies are just going to keep sidestepping the law, and continue to force our government to protect their interests, at the expense of ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Google DID NOT buy MySpace&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/30/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has recently come to light that there were other companies with their eye on MySpace, before it was scooped up by Rupert Murdoch and News Corp.  It seems Google was also considering it, but didn't go after it because it will essentially kill it's AdSense business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has recently come to light that there were other companies with their eye on MySpace, before it was scooped up by Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. It seems Google was also considering it, but didn&#8217;t go after it because it will essentially kill it&#8217;s <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/" target="_blank" title="Google AdSense">AdSense</a> business. Think about it, if they purchased a content site, with more hits per day then god him/her-self <em>(</em><em><a href="http://www.god.com/index.php" target="_blank" title="God Dot Com">s/he&#8217;s got his/her own homepage</a></em><em> it seems)</em>, they would be a direct competitor to every single one of their content partners that use <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/" target="_blank" title="Google AdSense">AdSense</a> to pay for their site.<br />
<a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002684.php" target="_blank" title="Battlle Media">Read the 2nd hand report here</a>, as told by an anonymous Google employee.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/the_REAL_reason_Google_did_NOT_buy_MySpace_-_AdSense_says_Web_2.0_Founder">spotted on digg.com</a></em></p>
<p><a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/37/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/" target="_blank" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/why-google-did-not-buy-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jupiter Research says MySpace best place to promote music, but I disagree&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Scrobbler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jupiter Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/02/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now for these to work you'll need to ensure that anywhere you post your Site's URL is clickable, but once these two forces (back links and referrals) start to go to work you should see your traffic steadily climb, and the percentage of traffic from MySpace increase.With your site firmly re-centered as your web presence, you can now start treating MySpace as an auxiliary publishing platform for your marketing messages....  Give visitors to your profile the opportunity to buy from you, as it may be your only chance to get their attention and keep it long enough from them to support you at what you do.There is no magic bullet when it comes to music marketing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/home">Jupiter Research</a>, usually a pretty good source for third party anaylsis, has recently placed <a href="http://music.myspace.com/">MySpace Music</a> above other rivals in being successful at promoting music. However, the report was suspect, in my opinion, not only in the way it was conducted, but also by which sites they covered.</p>
<p>First, the rivals to Myspace Music, as defined by this Jupiter Research Report, were Yahoo Music, MTV.com, and AOL Music. This essentially limits the list to 5 sites&#8230; not exactly a deep core sample among the universe of music community sites. Perhaps they were asleep at the wheel, but to disregard last.fm, a site that has been in existence in <a href="http://www.last.fm/">one form</a> or <a href="http://www.audioscrobbler.net/" target="_blank">another</a> for 5 or so years is ludicrous.</p>
<p>
MySpace is junk. The site was poorly architected, and poorly coded, and uses an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusebox_%28programming%29" target="_blank">outdated development framework</a> for <a href="http://www.coldfusion.com/" target="_blank">ColdFusion</a>. The design is atrocious, and I&#8217;m not talking about the customizations featured on individual profiles, either. With that said, MySpace, due to it&#8217;s size and supposed reach still can not be ignored. As far as promoting music goes, the study tracked promotional activity, across the five sites, on the Black Eyed Peas, whose recent sell-out come back was already generating plenty of buzz elsewhere before they exploited these community sites, which in my mind skews the results significantly. Think about it&#8230; the BEPs were being shoved down our throats long before they invaded community sites as &#8220;one of us&#8221;.</p>
<p>
Sure you&#8217;ll have results if you&#8217;re a big label buying space on the front page of <a href="http://music.myspace.com/" target="_blank">MySpace Music</a>, but what about the independents? A quick pass through the pages of MySpace and you&#8217;ll soon realize that all of this &#8220;community activity&#8221; is primarily made up of disingenuous &#8220;Thanks for the Add&#8221; billboard size graphics posted by your &#8220;friends&#8221; in your comments, bulletins that go largely ignored, RSVPs to Events that are accepted but not attended&#8230; the list goes on. So where are all the powerful promotion opportunities on these sites?</p>
<p>
If MySpace is your only website, then you&#8217;re already loosing half the promotional battle right there. From where I&#8217;m standing, one of the biggest values you can gain from MySpace is in back links. If you don&#8217;t have a site to link to, <a href="http://www.xentek.net/" target="_blank">get one</a>. No one is going to take you very seriously, anyway, if the only link you&#8217;ve got to give them is a MySpace address. If you do have a site, then make it the center of your web presence, and use MySpace as an auxiliary or what I like to call passive marketing site. MySpace is a huge site, with hundreds of thousands upon thousands (if not more) pages. All indexed by Google and the other search engines. This means that links from this site are weighted pretty heavily in their Search Algorithms, and you can take advantage of it by making sure you post your links throughout the site&#8230; on your profile, in your bulletins, and in your blog posts (you are using the blog on MySpace aren&#8217;t you?). This will ensure that your site will get better ranking (over time) in the search engines. You&#8217;ll also discover (if you haven&#8217;t already) that one of your biggest referrers is MySpace, if you have access to your site&#8217;s log files. Referrers, for those that don&#8217;t know, are the sites that your visitors were on before they clicked over to your site. Now for these to work you&#8217;ll need to ensure that anywhere you post your Site&#8217;s URL is clickable, but once these two forces (back links and referrals) start to go to work you should see your traffic steadily climb, and the percentage of traffic from MySpace increase.
</p>
<p>
With your site firmly re-centered as your web presence, you can now start treating MySpace as an auxiliary publishing platform for your marketing messages. Post tracks that you&#8217;re giving away on your site. Re-post news and events, and even better if they are enticing excerpts with links back to the main story on your site. Use the bulletins, and blog features to get the word out, but don&#8217;t expect a ton of traffic. Basically treat it as a copy+paste dumping ground for repurposing your other marketing. No one on MySpace is really reading it anyway, but at least it will be there for the small percentage of people that are following you on MySpace. Concentrate your efforts there to convert MySpace fans to tracking you on your web site, with your newsletters and other updates, and not relying on MySpace to do it for you. If you&#8217;ve got e-commerce capabilities, on your site or with some other service, then feature links to buy your album front-and-center on your MySpace profile. Give visitors to your profile the opportunity to buy from you, as it may be your only chance to get their attention and keep it long enough from them to support you at what you do.
</p>
<p>
There is no magic bullet when it comes to music marketing. You already know this. Community sites such as MySpace are great for passive marketing efforts, and creating nice back links to your main web site. You may be able to easily pump information into the system with out much effort, but so is everyone else. Once you recognize this fact, then your can set about to create a compelling message so that you can rise above the noise. However, for more serious community interaction, Last.fm, various message boards and mailing lists across the internet are the real community gold. Shame on Jupiter Research for not recognizing this fact.</p>
<p><a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/29/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/jupiter-research-says-myspace-best-place-to-promote-music-but-i-disagree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/google/feed/ ) in 0.42635 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:34 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 3:20 pm UTC -->
