<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Mind of The Arts &#187; Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com</link>
	<description>A fresh look at the media industry and how trends affect the independent artist and publisher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Studying? More like cramming&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/11/fcc-bends-over-for-corporate-interests-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/11/fcc-bends-over-for-corporate-interests-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-Span]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prometheus Radio Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/11/27/fcc-bends-over-for-corporate-interests-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on MSNBC Here&#8217;s something from a couple months ago. It&#8217;s novel to occasionally look back at all of the information that never makes it to us, the media consuming public. The FCC ordered all copies of a study on the localization of media ownership destroyed. This independent study examined the difference news coverage between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14836500/" target="_blank">MSNBC</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something from a couple months ago.  It&#8217;s novel to occasionally look back at all of the information that never makes it to us, the media consuming public.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/" target="_blank">FCC</a> ordered all copies of a study on the localization of media ownership destroyed.   This independent study examined the difference news coverage between locally owned and non-locally owned (i.e. transnational corporate) ownership of Television stations.  Since there are no copies of the report right now, it&#8217;s hard to say what&#8217;s actually in it.</p>
<p>Thanks to some civic minded folks, here&#8217;s the clip of Senator <a href="http://boxer.senate.gov/" target="_blank">Barbara Boxer</a> ripping FCC Chairman <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/martin/" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Kevin Martin</a> a new one, along with a description of the report.  Apparently, Sen. Boxer was sent a copy of the report anonymously (Video courtesy of <a href="http://www.c-span.org/" target="_blank">C-Span</a> via <a href="http://youtube.com" target="_blank">YouTube</a>).</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/vT0AIJkO-aM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vT0AIJkO-aM" /></object></p>
<p>Apparently, the study concludes that local ownership of TV stations increases the amount of local news coverage by about thirty three hours of news in a year about your area.  Now, lots of local news may seem hokey and trite, but 33 hours more is plenty of room for real stories of value about our communities.</p>
<p>It would seem that the trend for the FCC is to only release information that is favorable to corporate consolidation of the broadcast medium, and all conflicting reports seem to be squelched.  You can view two of these reports <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267448A1.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267479A1.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>, through the <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php" target="_blank">Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting website</a>.  A few politicians <a href="http://www.house.gov/list/press/ny22_hinchey/morenews/092106FCCIG.html" target="_blank" class="broken_link">demanded and investigation</a> into this incident, but somehow nothing further has surfaced.  It did take more than a few minutes of crawling through the interweb to find out that there was an inquiry made at all.  That story never made it out as a press release.  In fact, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be nay follow up on this story at all since then.<br />
The <a href="http://www.benton.org/" target="_blank">Benton Foundation</a> has a great list of link about the issue of media consolidation and local representation on the airwaves <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/3778" target="_blank">here</a></strong></span>.  Of course, it&#8217;s not all bad news.  The FCC started a new <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/" target="_blank">Review of Media Ownership Rules</a> in June, so maybe this time they&#8217;ll give us back the airwaves.  They&#8217;re even holding <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/hearings.html" target="_blank">public hearings</a>.</p>
<p>In the meantime, you can take stand to help free the airwaves by checking out the <a href="http://prometheusradio.org/" target="_blank">Prometheus Radio Project</a>.  With the corporate move to digital, they should consider turning the radio dial over to the people again.  Unless they take FM and AM receivers out of cars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/11/fcc-bends-over-for-corporate-interests-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1% Rule vs. The 1:1 Ratio</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One only has to look at iLife, Apple's Am/Pro-Am content creation suite (now complete with a webpage editor that sports RSS feeds).Some have put forth a suggestion, that only 1% of the online world is creating content....  Their numbers, stating that out of 100 people, 1 would create the content, 10 would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other 89 users would simple view it.Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally The 1:1 Ratio holds true for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An emerging trend in the online world is that the gap between content creator and the content consumer is closing. Personal Computers come pre-installed with many content creation tools, and many more aimed at the Amateur to the Pro-Am content cretor abound. One only has to look at <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/" title="Apple's iLife '06">iLife, Apple&#8217;s Am/Pro-Am content creation suite </a>(now <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/iweb/" title="Apple's iWeb">complete with a webpage editor</a> that sports RSS feeds).<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/" title="Guardian Unlimited">Some</a> have put forth a suggestion, that only <strong>1%</strong> of the online world is creating content. This seems awfully low to me. I have always thought of it as <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>, for every content creator in a community there is a consumer, that in turn is also a creator. Their numbers, stating that out of <strong>100</strong> people, <strong>1</strong> would create the content, <strong>10</strong> would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other <strong>89</strong> users would simple view it.<br />
Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong> holds true for me. Their numbers come from YouTube&#8217;s upload vs download ratio, and obviously skew the results because of the size of the sample. I&#8217;m not doubting their findings, but it&#8217;s interesting to hear the same theory in different contexts.<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1823959,00.html?gusrc=rss" target="_blank">Read the article</a>, and decide for yourself. It&#8217;d be cool if you <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#respond" title="Leave a Comment For Us!">left a comment</a> too, and let me know which rule holds more true for you, <strong>The 1% Rule</strong>, or <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_1_Rule">digg story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/48/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/study/feed/ ) in 0.39492 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:29 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 3:16 pm UTC -->
