<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Mind of The Arts &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com</link>
	<description>A fresh look at the media industry and how trends affect the independent artist and publisher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>How Collective Idiocy Left the Record Companies in Bits</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/03/how-collective-idiocy-left-the-record-companies-in-bits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/03/how-collective-idiocy-left-the-record-companies-in-bits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/03/26/how-collective-idiocy-left-the-record-companies-in-bits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted On: The Guardian &#8220;When the history of our digital times comes to be written, one of the questions that will puzzle historians is why the record companies missed the significance of the internet.&#8221; What a great thought (and a very catchy headline). Here is a summary of the article, with some commentary. Since World [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted On: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2007/dec/09/internet.netmusic?gusrc=rss&#038;feed=technology">The Guardian</a></p>
<p>&#8220;When the history of our digital times comes to be written, one of the questions that will puzzle historians is why the record companies missed the significance of the internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a great thought (and a very catchy headline).  Here is a summary of the article, with some commentary.</p>
<p>Since World War II, the record industry had a total monopoly on the recording, packaging, and distribution of music.  They controlled the careers or artists, the way the music was disseminated, and dictated terms to music retailers.  When the CD came around in the early 1980&#8242;s, and as the article says &#8220;recording studios converted the sounds made by musicians into bitstreams &#8211; long sequences of ones and zeroes &#8211; while, at the consumer end, CD players converted those bits back into high-fidelity sound.&#8221;</p>
<p>The sales model for this era was to create the plastic disks and packaging, ship them distribution houses, and then off to retailers.  While this model proved to be profitable, the overhead costs were astronomical, with up to 50% of the retail price of a CD eaten up by production costs.</p>
<p>The internet was poised to change all of this for major labels.  It presented the opportunity to drop production costs to the floor, while expanding profits.  But the internet was ignored at first, and then it was treated as a realm for legal prosecution.  Even bands chimed in, complaining about the evils of the internet.  This practice got so widespread that the RIAA began prosecuting teenagers and single moms.  And as the industry resisted the internet, CD sales bottomed out.</p>
<p>To put it simply, the major labels did not want to let go of CDs in the face of an evolving marketplace.  Rather than adapt to the climate, they attempted to maintain the status quo.   The writer of the article states &#8220;The obvious hypothesis &#8211; that the senior executives of all the record companies were idiots &#8211; has always seemed implausible to me. Or it did until I read the recent interview in Wired magazine with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/Doug%20Morris:%20Music%20Industry%20Genius%20or%20Bitter%20Luddite?" class="broken_link">Doug Morris</a>, chairman and CEO of Universal Music Group.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because CDs were so profitable, the music industry turned a blind eye to what was next, and settled into a short sighted approoch rather than looking at the big picture.</p>
<p>Bottom Line: The record industry can turn itself around virtually overnight by embracing and adapting to technology.  Welcome to the Future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/03/how-collective-idiocy-left-the-record-companies-in-bits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIAA Chief Wants to Put Filters On Every PC and Network</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/02/riaa-chief-wants-to-put-filters-on-every-pc-and-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/02/riaa-chief-wants-to-put-filters-on-every-pc-and-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/02/18/riaa-chief-wants-to-put-filters-on-every-pc-and-network/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted On: ArsTechnica The RIAA&#8217;s head, Cary Sherman, wants to put encryption on our computer that will force us to decrypt music before listening to it. In other words, the filter will scan all your incoming data and then either allow or deny your ability to listen to it. since this idea likely won&#8217;t be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted On: <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080207-riaa-boss-spyware-could-solve-the-encryption-problem.html?">ArsTechnica</a></p>
<p>The RIAA&#8217;s head, Cary Sherman, wants to put encryption on our computer that will force us to decrypt music before listening to it.  In other words, the filter will scan all your incoming data and then either allow or deny your ability to listen to it.  since this idea likely won&#8217;t be popular (who&#8217;s  going to willingly put a filter on their computer that blocks the files they are downloading?), the next suggestion is to put the filters in our <em>modems.</em></p>
<p>Despite the predictable public backlash against these tactics (in an environment where the RIAA already has public approval that rivals the US Congress),  some ISPs are moving ahead with these filters.  The technical specifics are a bit thick, suffice it to say that various file <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption">encryptions</a> can bypass these filters unless entire <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_%28computing%29">protocols</a> are blocked.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video of Mr. Sherman lauding the glories of filtering:</p>
<p><object width="350" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dxYGZ7Z6joQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dxYGZ7Z6joQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="280"></embed></object></p>
<p>Bottom Line: Being out of touch with your consumers&#8217; needs does not improve your financial picture, or your credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2008/02/riaa-chief-wants-to-put-filters-on-every-pc-and-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cult of Personality &#8211; The Modern Artist&#8217;s Mantra</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/10/the-cult-of-personality-the-modern-artists-mantra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/10/the-cult-of-personality-the-modern-artists-mantra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artist Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/10/26/the-cult-of-personality-the-modern-artists-mantra/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I&#8217;ve notice that there are musicians and artists that are tuning into this frequency, so here&#8217;s something for you to consider: The future for musicians looks like more than just great recordings and live shows. The opportunities that the internet provides modern artists is available to everyone, and thus its potential is diluted. One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I&#8217;ve notice that there are musicians and artists that are tuning into this frequency, so here&#8217;s something for you to consider:</p>
<p>The future for musicians looks like more than just great recordings and live shows.  The opportunities that the internet provides modern artists is available to everyone, and thus its potential is diluted.  One powerful tool in creating buzz around your project or career is to get noticed.  And one way to get noticed is to generate interest in who you are, and what you&#8217;re saying.  in other words, creating and maintaining a conversation with your audience.</p>
<p>Pop culture can overwhelm us with the personal lives of famous people, and annoy us to no end with the antics of celebrities.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001349897">Billboard</a> has an excellent article on the effect of this kind of marketing on the careers of the ultra-famous.  Keeping themselves in the public eye is a critical element to the careers of these top tier entertainers.  Even bad press is good press for them.</p>
<p>For the independent artist, this same technique can yield different results.  We can expand our scope and reach by generating attention for who we are, and what we have to say.   Marketing a personality is nothing new.  Here&#8217;s an article from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,948247,00.html">Time Magazine in 1978</a>, looking at the same methods and issues we are discussing today.</p>
<p>Once you have fulfilled your artistic vision, and you&#8217;re putting yourself out there, the make-or-break factor in success becomes notoriety.  While having ten thousand friends on Myspace seems like a powerful promotional tool, does it really measure anything other than the number of people that landed on your page and clicked add me?</p>
<p>One of the most effective tools for creating a buzz for yourself, your project, and what you&#8217;re up to is blogging, and blogging often.  If you are anything like me, you spend at least some of your week surfing the internet and consuming content.  You have sites that you visit regularly.  Consider that what keeps you coming back to a site is the steady stream of new and interesting content.  Content that speaks to you.</p>
<p>A healthy career is grown through a fanbase.  Radiohead, Nine Inch Nails, Prince, and Madonna are able to free themselves from major labels and even give away their music because their fans are loyal, and people are tuning in.</p>
<p>While it may seem like the forward momentum is slow, steady and regular content on your project webpage, blog, or social networking page is critical to bring people back.  And the more time people spend on your sites, the more interested they will be in supporting your cause.</p>
<p>I am guilty of not providing a steady stream of information on my blogs at times, and it impacts my return traffic, and the hype around my own projects and Polyvibe.  I am preparing to condense this blog with my personal blog, providing the same great content with half the work.  Like Uncle Scrooge says, work smarter, not harder.</p>
<p>For any artist who is committed to bringing viability to their career, having a powerful voice, and keeping the conversation going are critical elements to success.</p>
<p>I invite you to comment on this post with your opinions.  If the waters ripple, we&#8217;ll talk more about creating a cult of personality, the results people are seeing from this kind of grassroots marketing, and methodology that can be implemented to increase your results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2007/10/the-cult-of-personality-the-modern-artists-mantra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limewire Fights Back Against RIAA</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/limewire-fights-back-against-riaa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/limewire-fights-back-against-riaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/11/limewire-fights-back-against-riaa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on: Axiomsun Limewire was sued recently by the RIAA in yet another attempt to control the public&#8217;s consumption of media.? Once again, the RIAA has selected their own interpretation of MGM vs. Grokster.? Although that case defined the infrigement as having to be active by a group or service, the RIAA and MPAA continue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted on: <a target="_blank" title="Axiom Sun" href="http://axiomsun.com/technology_blogs/tech_dirt/limewire_hits_back_hard_sues_riaa_for_antitrust_and_consumer_fraud.html">Axiomsun</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" title="Limewire" href="http://www.limewire.com/">Limewire</a> was <a target="_blank" title="RIAA/Limewire Suit" href="http://info.riaalawsuits.us/documents.htm#Arista_v_LimeWire" class="broken_link">sued</a> recently by the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.riaa.com">RIAA</a> in yet another attempt to control the public&#8217;s consumption of media.?  Once again, the RIAA has selected their own interpretation of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/" class="broken_link">MGM vs. Grokster</a>.?  Although that case defined the infrigement as having to be active by a group or service, the RIAA and MPAA continue to chase any group that offers p2p portal sfor file sharing.  They contuinue to claim that organizations like Limewire bear the entire responsibility for how their users behave.?  I always love this argument, becuase it;s the same as saying that if you sell a gun to someone, you are responsible if they use ti to rob a bank.?  Of course, there&#8217;s no constitutional amendment protecting our right to bear file sharing software.<br />
So now Limewire has filed a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filename=arista_limewire_060925answercounterclaim">countersuit</a>, accusing the RIAA of anti-trust violations.?  This suit claims the RIAA is trying to &#8220;destroy any online music distribution service they did not own or control, or force such services to do business with them on exclusive and/or other anticompetitive terms so as to limit and ultimately control the distribution and pricing of digital music, all to the detriment of consumers.&#8221; (Counterclaim, paragraph 26, page 18)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see that someone is finally standing up to the <a target="_blank" title="Transnational Media Montoring" href="http://www.tbsjournal.com/Archives/Spring01/nordenstreng.html">transnational conglomerates</a>, although it remains to be seen what will come of it.?  The good news about all this is it would appear the balance is finally tipping, and the death knell for the music &#8216;industry&#8217; is ringing louder than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/limewire-fights-back-against-riaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death of Dynamic Range</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/death-of-dynamic-range/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/death-of-dynamic-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/11/death-of-dynamic-range/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on:? Austin360.com Read the article here. This is a great article about Dynamic Range, and how it&#8217;s gone out of style.? In the frenzy of making music louder and louder, modern music has become a static filled mess of clips, where the loudes and softest sounds are often almost identical.? We highly recommend you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted on:?  <a target="_blank" title="Austin360.com" href="http://www.austin360.com">Austin360.com</a></p>
<p>Read the article <a target="_blank" href="http://www.austin360.com/music/content/music/stories/xl/2006/09/28cover.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>This is a great article about <a target="_blank" title="Wiki: Dynamic Range" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_range">Dynamic Range</a>, and how it&#8217;s gone out of style.?  In the frenzy of making music louder and louder, modern music has become a static filled mess of clips, where the loudes and softest sounds are often almost identical.?  We highly recommend you check this article out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/10/death-of-dynamic-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We </title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/09/we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/09/we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RightCart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/09/27/we/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since we&#8217;ve posted here, and the draught has finally ended.? We figure the best way to get back on track is to bring something newsworthy, relevant, and cool. If you haven&#8217;t heard of RightCart, we invite you to check them out.? This e-commerce technology is fully integrated into any webpage running [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since we&#8217;ve posted here, and the draught has finally ended.?  We figure the best way to get back on track is to bring something newsworthy, relevant, and cool.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t heard of <a target="_blank" title="www.RightCart.com" href="http://www.rightcart.com">RightCart</a>, we invite you to check them out.?  This <a target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Electronic Commerce" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_commerce">e-commerce </a>technology is fully integrated into any webpage running their code .?  And the code required to use RightCart is only 3 lines long, and given to the user.</p>
<p>We recently launched our <a target="_blank" title="Polyvibe Store" href="http://www.polyvi.be/store" class="broken_link">Polyvibe Store</a> using RightCart.?  If you check out our <a target="_blank" title="Polyvibe Catalog" href="https://www.polyvi.be/store/music/" class="broken_link">catalog page</a>, you will see the RightCart is snugly plugged in to the right column.?  You can add things to the cart and check out without ever leaving our page, and it&#8217;s totally secure.</p>
<p>We think this is <em>the </em>coolest online checkout we&#8217;ve ever seen, so we want to share it with you.?  You can <a target="_blank" title="Rightcart Demo" href="http://rightcart.com/signup/screencasts" class="broken_link">see how it works</a> for yourself.?  It&#8217;s even <a target="_blank" title="RightCart on Myspace" href="http://myspace.com/rightcart">Myspace</a> friendly.</p>
<p>We <3 RightCart, and we just wanted to share our enthusiasm with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/09/we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPAA decides they know more than the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Mell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bit Torrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TorrentSpy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/02/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this article:? Sue Google, Not Us, Torrentspy tells Hollywood (spotted on PCWelt) In a legal reply to the MPAA, TorrentSpy claims a person can find more torrents through Google than you can through a torrent portal.? The argunment goes on to say that since TorrentSpy doesn&#8217;t have any copyrighted work on their site, they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this article:?  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcwelt.de/news/englishnews/134613/">Sue Google, Not Us, Torrentspy tells Hollywood</a> (spotted on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcwelt.de/news/englishnews/">PCWelt</a>)<br />
In a legal reply to the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mpaa.org/">MPAA</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.torrentspy.com/">TorrentSpy</a> claims a person can find more torrents through Google than you can through a torrent portal.?  The argunment goes on to say that since TorrentSpy doesn&#8217;t have any copyrighted work on their site, they cannot be held responsible for what people do after they leave their site.<br />
The basis of lawsuits like this is <a target="_blank" href="http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/p2plegalitiesandethics/a/grokster.htm">MGM vs. Grokster</a>.?  In that case it was decided by the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/">Supreme Court</a> that Grokster actively provided tools and promotion for pirating.?  Of course, the Supreme Court also ruled in that case that the act of file sharing, or using <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P2p">p2p software</a> is *_not_* illegal.?  They also ruled that unless a manufacturer actively promotes <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement">piracy</a>, they cannot be held liable for what people do with the software.</p>
<p>So to review for you, TorrentSpy points you toward people who are sharing files you may want, and that&#8217;s all they do.?  They don&#8217;t suggest you steal stuff, and they don;t promote any method of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement#Methods_of_copyright_infringement">copyright infringement</a>. According to the Supreme Court, that means they&#8217;re not breaking the law.?  The MPAA (and the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.riaa.com">RIAA</a>, too) don&#8217;t really care if the Supreme Court allows TorrentSpy to point you toward copyrighted material that&#8217;s shared.?  They are going to sue us all until we pay what they feel they deserve.?  And if that isn&#8217;t enough, they twist the meaning of copyright to protect themselves, and not the artists.<br />
Now I am all for the protection of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17.html">copyrighted works</a>, and I don&#8217;t see a problem with the moral issue that somone&#8217;s movies or music shouldn&#8217;t be free _if there is percieved value._?  But if reality is that people are sharing media, and that most people _still_ buy media, then there is a softer hand to be used to convince us to buy stuff.</p>
<p>As an aside for Americans, these big companies are just going to keep sidestepping the law, and continue to force our government to protect their interests, at the expense of ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/08/mpaa-decides-they-know-more-than-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Linkie Winkie  ; )</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/hello-linkie-winkie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/hello-linkie-winkie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FeedBurner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassroots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/28/hello-linkie-winkie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Chief Technology Officer for Polyvibe Entertainment Group, and the resident internet-nerd, I am a bono-fied stats geek. Every email we send, every myspace post, every blog post, every news update, every everything, I look to see if what we did made an impact on our site traffic and our visibility. So, as I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
As Chief Technology Officer for <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/about/" target="_blank" title="About Polyvibe Entertainment Group" class="broken_link">Polyvibe Entertainment Group</a>, and the resident internet-nerd, I am a bono-fied stats geek. Every <a href="http://www.polyvi.be/newsletterpro/" target="_blank" title="Sign up for Polyvibe Records&#039; Newsletter" class="broken_link">email</a> we send, every <a href="http://www.myspace.com/polyviberecords" target="_blank" class="broken_link">myspace</a> post, every <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/">blog</a> post, every <a href="http://polyvi.be/" target="_blank" class="broken_link">news</a> update, every <a href="http://www.dethawed.com/" target="_blank" title="Dethawed - another fine polyvibe product" class="broken_link">everything</a>, I look to see if what we did made an impact on our site traffic and our visibility. So, as I was going through the list of bots in our <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/06/23/we-love-feedburner-and-it-shows/" target="_blank" title="We Love Feedburner, and it shows!">feedburner stats</a>, I noticed a new one. The one that calls itself <a href="http://www.linkiewinkie.com/" target="_blank" title="Hello, Linkie Winkie?  ; )">Linkie Winkie</a>. What&#8217;s interesting about this bot is that the corresponding page is decidedly lo-tech and quite spartan, only sporting a few links and an Alexa traffic chart. The only other text on the page is this cryptic description:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>&#8220;Linkie Winkie is a bit of a social experiment and we want to see what happens. We&#8217;re not going to tell you much about it, except that its a very altruistic little site and loves to be talked about.</em></p>
<p><em>So if you can work out what it does, and get your timing right, then Linkie Winkie might help you out for a while.&#8221;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>
From what we can tell, by giving a shout out to <a href="http://www.linkiewinkie.com/" target="_blank" title="Hello, Linkie Winkie?  ; )">Linkie Winkie</a>, they will in turn to give you a shout out. How it does this, is still a mystery, but <a href="http://thisbiochemicallife.com/2006/07/26/what-the-hell-is-linkiewinkie/" target="_blank" title="One Account of Linkie Winkie&#039;s effect on their site traffic" class="broken_link">one blog discusses the effect</a> of <a href="http://www.linkiewinkie.com/" target="_blank" title="Hello, Linkie Winkie?  ; )">Linkie Winkie</a>, while the other <a href="http://www.tribbleagency.com/?p=25" target="_blank" title="Tribble Ad Agency">provides a bit on who is behind</a> <a href="http://www.linkiewinkie.com/" target="_blank" title="Hello, Linkie Winkie?  ; )">the experiment</a>.
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;ll provide an update here if anything comes of this, but participating in a social experiment of the web 2.0 variety just seemed like a fun think to do on a Friday evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/hello-linkie-winkie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1% Rule vs. The 1:1 Ratio</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Polyvibe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video On Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One only has to look at iLife, Apple's Am/Pro-Am content creation suite (now complete with a webpage editor that sports RSS feeds).Some have put forth a suggestion, that only 1% of the online world is creating content....  Their numbers, stating that out of 100 people, 1 would create the content, 10 would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other 89 users would simple view it.Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally The 1:1 Ratio holds true for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An emerging trend in the online world is that the gap between content creator and the content consumer is closing. Personal Computers come pre-installed with many content creation tools, and many more aimed at the Amateur to the Pro-Am content cretor abound. One only has to look at <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/" title="Apple's iLife '06">iLife, Apple&#8217;s Am/Pro-Am content creation suite </a>(now <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/iweb/" title="Apple's iWeb">complete with a webpage editor</a> that sports RSS feeds).<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/" title="Guardian Unlimited">Some</a> have put forth a suggestion, that only <strong>1%</strong> of the online world is creating content. This seems awfully low to me. I have always thought of it as <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>, for every content creator in a community there is a consumer, that in turn is also a creator. Their numbers, stating that out of <strong>100</strong> people, <strong>1</strong> would create the content, <strong>10</strong> would interact with it (commenting on it, offering suggestions to improve it, etc.) while the other <strong>89</strong> users would simple view it.<br />
Maybe I just travel in more creative circles, because anecdotally <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong> holds true for me. Their numbers come from YouTube&#8217;s upload vs download ratio, and obviously skew the results because of the size of the sample. I&#8217;m not doubting their findings, but it&#8217;s interesting to hear the same theory in different contexts.<br />
<a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1823959,00.html?gusrc=rss" target="_blank">Read the article</a>, and decide for yourself. It&#8217;d be cool if you <a href="http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/#respond" title="Leave a Comment For Us!">left a comment</a> too, and let me know which rule holds more true for you, <strong>The 1% Rule</strong>, or <strong>The 1:1 Ratio</strong>.<br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_1_Rule">digg story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/48/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/the-1-rule-vs-the-11-ratio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with &#8220;RIAA vs The People&#8221; founder Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Marden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-To-Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/27/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Brown of the Free Software Foundation speaks with Ray Beckerman, lawyer for defendants in RIAA lawsuits about the impact of the RIAA's legal strategy on the internet, copyright, DRM and our digital freedoms.  He leads the discussion with the reason why only small law firms, or individual lawyers will ever take up the cause of those being sued by the RIAA.He also dissects a typical RIAA "investigation" that form the basis of their suit against their customers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Brown of the <a href="http://www.fsf.org/" title="Free Software Foundation">Free Software Foundation</a> speaks with Ray Beckerman, lawyer for defendants in RIAA lawsuits about the impact of the RIAA&#8217;s legal strategy on the internet, copyright, DRM and our digital freedoms. He leads the discussion with the reason why only small law firms, or individual lawyers will ever take up the cause of those being sued by the RIAA.<br />
He also dissects a typical RIAA &#8220;investigation&#8221; that form the basis of their suit against their customers. In essense the RIAA creates an account with a p2p network, finds users with RIAA tunes in their shared folder, and files the report. However, and this is the kicker, there is no proof of wrongdoing. That is, there is no proof that the user did not obtain the song through legal means (purchasing them, or making a back-up copy from a CD they legally own), nor is there proof that other users have ever downloaded the song. In other words, most of the RIAA lawsuits brought against consumers are mere ploys to extort money.<br />
Many users have settled out of court. The few that fight it get into long drawn out court cases where every dirty trick in the book is used by the RIAA Legal Team to make it prohibitively expensive for the defendant to continue fighting the case. Lawyers, such as Ray Beckerman, are working pro bono or for significantly reduced rates on the behalf of the few brave souls willing to stand up and challenge the RIAA. Especially since many of the defendants have never used p2p software before, and until their subpoena arrived in the mail had never even heard of Kazzaa and the like.<br />
If you want to help, you can <a href="https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/dbd" title="Donate Money to help fund Defendants against RIAA Lawsuits">donate money to the Free Software Foundation</a>.<br />
Keep up with Ray and his fight against the RIAA at his blog: <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/" title="Recording Industry vs. The People">RIAA vs. The People</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/DefectiveByDesignCallWithRayBeckerman/DBD_Call_with_Ray_20060719b_64kb.mp3" title="Interview with Ray Beckerman, Lawyer defending people against lawsuits brought on by the RIAA">Download The MP3 recording of the call</a><br />
<em><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_truth_about_the_RIAA_lawsuits_-_DefectiveByDesign.org">digg this story</a></em><br />
<a href="http://dr.xnlb.com/blog/47/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/" title="originally published on dr.xnlb.com">originally published on dr.xnlb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/2006/07/interview-with-riaa-vs-the-people-founder-ray-beckerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.archive.org/download/DefectiveByDesignCallWithRayBeckerman/DBD_Call_with_Ray_20060719b_64kb.mp3" length="7290540" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.polyvibeentertainmentgroup.com/tag/technology/feed/ ) in 0.66821 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:20 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 4:06 pm UTC -->
